12/18/2019 · Tanious v The Empire Life Insurance Company, 2019 BCCA 329, per Dickson J.A. Facts + Issues. The Respondent insured (Tanious) was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and her physical, cognitive, and emotional health deteriorated.
Empire Life Insurance Company: 2019-12-11: Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) Noha Tanious : 2019-12-11: Respondent’s response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2019-12-11: Noha Tanious : 2019-12-06: Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED …
In today’s case ( Tanious v . The Empire Life Insurance Company ) the Plaintiff was insured with the Defendant. She became disabled and sought long term disability benefits but the Defendant ‘rejected her claim’.
12/9/2020 · A recent BC Court of Appeal case, Tanious v. The Empire Life Insurance Company, 2019 BCCA 329 [ Tanious ], gives disability insurance claimants who take their insurers to court greater prospects of obtaining special costs against their insurer, even absent malicious conduct. However, the specific details of the case are very important.
7/10/2017 · In Tanious v. the Empire Life Insurance Company, 2017 BCSC 85 the BC Supreme Court has further clarified the circumstances under which a party may reasonably seek full solicitor client costs (full indemnity costs or special costs) following a successful trial.
